News

Important Information about the Main Exam on Monday, July 29

Written on 26.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

The first exam will take place on Monday, July 29. Please read the following carefully:

  • Check your assigned lecture hall and seat on your personal status page (scroll down to see the section “Exam Seats”). Only students who have an assigned seat can partake in the exam. If you think that you… Read more

The first exam will take place on Monday, July 29. Please read the following carefully:

  • Check your assigned lecture hall and seat on your personal status page (scroll down to see the section “Exam Seats”). Only students who have an assigned seat can partake in the exam. If you think that you should have a seat but your personal status page does not show one, then please get in touch with me as soon as possible.
  • We will start at 10 am sharp with the exam. Please be in front of your assigned lecture hall at 9:45 at the very latest. Students who are late might be denied entry to the lecture hall and therefore cannot participate in the exam.
  • The exam will take 120 minutes.
  • You will need your student ID card, as well as a pen with indelible black or blue ink, preferably a ballpoint pen. Fountain pen ink that can be erased with ink eradicators ("Tintenkiller") is not indelible and therefore not allowed to be used in the exam.
  • You may bring one handwritten, double-sided DIN-A4 cheat sheet. Dictionaries are not allowed unless your dictionary is accepted by the staff member in your lecture hall before the start of the exam.
  • If you bring food, make sure that it's not noisy or smelly.

If you have any urgent questions regarding the organizational details of the exam, please get in touch with me in time.

See you on Monday!
Sarah


Two more hints:

  • Only answer the exam question, and don't write more. Especially, if you are not asked for a definition, you do not have to give one.
  • I deemed at least one of the multiple-choice questions proposed by you to be a suitable question for the exam.

Feedback for Project Phase 6 (Report)

Written on 22.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

The feedback for Project Phase 6 is out now. Please take a look at it on your personal status page.

Best wishes,
Sarah

IMPORTANT: Exam Registration

Written on 21.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

Please don't forget to duly register for the main exam, if you want to take part in it. (If you don't want to partake in the main exam, e.g. because you only want to take the re-exam, you can ignore this email.)
Everybody who wants to take the exam has to be registered in the… Read more

Hello everybody,

Please don't forget to duly register for the main exam, if you want to take part in it. (If you don't want to partake in the main exam, e.g. because you only want to take the re-exam, you can ignore this email.)
Everybody who wants to take the exam has to be registered in the dCMS. Additionally, you probably have to register in the LSF, too.

Case 1 – You are in a study program that can register in the LSF:
Register in the LSF before the deadline. (I suspect that the deadline will be he end of today for most of you.) Also register in the dCMS by the end of tomorrow.
Case 2 – You are in a study program that cannot register in the LSF:
Double-check whether you really cannot register in the LSF. Then register only in the dCMS. Make sure that your subject of study is up to date in the dCMS. If it is not, get in touch before the exam.

If you can register in the LSF, but fail to do so, then I unfortunately cannot let you attend the exam. If you have any questions or experience any problems, get in touch as soon as you can.

Best wishes,
Sarah

 

Feedback for Revisions of Project Phase 5

Written on 13.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

The feedback for the revisions of Project Phase 5 is out now. Some of you would have failed this submission and therefore lost their exam admission. However, since the feedback took us longer than anticipated, I decided to mark every submission as a "pass".  But I want to make the… Read more

Hello everybody,

The feedback for the revisions of Project Phase 5 is out now. Some of you would have failed this submission and therefore lost their exam admission. However, since the feedback took us longer than anticipated, I decided to mark every submission as a "pass".  But I want to make the few groups that got close to failing the resubmission aware that a performance like this would not pass in the exam! So, please make sure to study well for the exam.

Best wishes,
Sarah

 

Deadline Extension until 9pm

Written on 12.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

To take some last-minute pressure out, the deadline for the submission of the report was extended by three hours until 8:59 pm today.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Guest Talk on Fairness with Camera Crew TODAY

Written on 10.07.24 (last change on 11.07.24) by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

today, there will be a guest talk by Eric Mayer about Tradeoffs between Faireness and Accuracy. The talk will be in German only, so the following info will be in German, too. Of course, the talk will not be relevant for the exam.

Vortrag von Eric Mayer

Tradeoffs zwischen… Read more

Hello everybody,

today, there will be a guest talk by Eric Mayer about Tradeoffs between Faireness and Accuracy. The talk will be in German only, so the following info will be in German, too. Of course, the talk will not be relevant for the exam.

Vortrag von Eric Mayer

Tradeoffs zwischen Fairness und Accuracy in KI: warum wir nicht alles haben können

Donnerstag, 11.07. von 14:15 Uhr bis ca. 15:45 Uhr in HS 003, Geb. E1 3

Heute, am 11.07., findet um 14:15 Uhr ein Gastvortrag von Informatiker und TV-Moderator Eric Mayer mit anschließender Diskussion statt. Der Vortrag wird im Rahmen einer Dokumentation von 3sat gefilmt und je voller der Hörsaal dabei ist, desto besser sieht das natürlich für den SIC aus. Wenn ihr euch für den Vortrag interessiert und/oder einfach mal eine Fernsehproduktion mitbekommen wollt, kommt gerne vorbei. Der Vortrag findet auf Deutsch statt.

Abstract: Learning-basierte Systeme als Entscheider in der Praxis einzusetzen, stellt uns vor zahlreiche Herausforderungen. Eine davon sind die unvermeidlichen Tradeoffs zwischen Fairness und Accuracy in KI-Systemen. Zum einen wollen wir, dass Systeme fair sind, zum anderen, dass sie möglichst genaue Vorhersagen treffen. Der Vortrag beschäftigt sich mit verschiedenen Fairnessmetriken und zeigt, wie ihre Optimierung die Genauigkeit des Modells beeinflusst. Wie mit diesen Tradeoffs umgegenagen werden muss, ist alles andere als klar. Eine von vielen möglichen Lösungen schlagen wir hier vor.

Zum Vortragenden: Eric Mayer hat eigentlich Theater-, Film- und Medienwissenschaft und Amerikanistik studiert, bevor er Moderator wurde. Als sich seinen Fokus immer mehr auf Wissenschaftsjournalismus verschob, beschloss er, noch ein Studium der Informatik anzuhängen. Vor einiger Zeit hat er mit seiner berufsbegleitenden Promotion in Informatik begonnen und wird bald am SIC zu Gast sein. Seine Reise vom Kinderfernsehmoderator zum Wissenschaftler wird hin und wieder von einem Dokuteam begleitet, das auch am 11.07. mit dabei sein wird. Weil die Filmaufnahmen in einer deutschsprachigen Sendung bei 3sat ausgestrahlt werden sollen, ist der Vortrag ausnahmsweise auf Deutsch.

Wichtige Informationen zu den Dreharbeiten und euren Rechten: Ihr solltet nur zum Vortrag kommen, wenn ihr damit einverstanden seid, dass ihr gefilmt werdet. Auch die Diskussion wird gefilmt und eure Fragen werden entsprechend mitaufgenommen. Das Filmteam würde im Anschluss auch gerne einige Fragen an das Publikum richten. Eure Antworten, falls ihr welche geben wollt, wären dann ebenfalls auf den Aufnahmen. Bitte kommt nur, wenn ihr mit den Aufnahmen einverstanden seid. Vor Ort werdet ihr gfls. ein Formular unterschreiben, das dem Team erlaubt, die Aufnahmen von euch auch tatsächlich zu verwenden. Ihr könnt euer Einverständnis für die Filmaufnahmen nicht mehr im Nachhinein zurückziehen. Mehr Datenschutzhinweise findet ihr vor Ort.

Viele Grüße,
Sarah 

Clarification on Today's Slides

Written on 08.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello again,

There seemingly was confusion about today's slides. So, I want to make a clarification: What's not reasonably clear from in slides of today (especially slides 1-5) is not relevant for the exam. However, there are things that are clearly described on the slides. In fact, almost… Read more

Hello again,

There seemingly was confusion about today's slides. So, I want to make a clarification: What's not reasonably clear from in slides of today (especially slides 1-5) is not relevant for the exam. However, there are things that are clearly described on the slides. In fact, almost everything from slide 7 onwards is rather descriptive and has quite a bit of explanatory text. You should have a very rough idea of what these slides say (and not necessarily more than a very rough idea). If you struggle with getting the rough idea of these slides, feel free to come to the office hours.

Best wishes,
Sarah
 

Exam Relevance of Today's Lecture (and Evaluation)

Written on 08.07.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

Due to technical issues in the Günter Hotz lecture hall, the audio of the lecture was recorded improperly. I only have audio available from the moment I started a manual recording on my phone. Therefore, only the second half of the lecture is available as a video.

Hello everybody,

Due to technical issues in the Günter Hotz lecture hall, the audio of the lecture was recorded improperly. I only have audio available from the moment I started a manual recording on my phone. Therefore, only the second half of the lecture is available as a video.

  • For the first part that is not available as a video, only the slides are relevant for the exam, not what I said during the lecture.
  • For the second part that is available as a video, also the video and what I said during the lecture are relevant for the exam.

I apologize for the inconvenience!

Also, lecture evaluations are currently ongoing. If you want to rate the lecture and have not done so already, please go here: https://qualis.uni-saarland.de/eva/?l=149443&p=ugjqur
I would appreciate a lot if you could tell the evaluation office how you feel about Ethics for Nerds.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Room Change: Tomorrow's Lecture is in Lecture Hall III, Building E2 5

Written on 30.06.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

because some repairs have to be done in the Günter Hotz lecture hall, we will move to lecture hall III in building E2 5 for the lecture tomorrow, on July 1. The lecture will take place as usual, just in a different lecture hall. See you tomorrow!

Best wishes,
Sarah

Results of Project Phase 5

Written on 27.06.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

The results of Project Phase 5 are online now. There will be a „Fix My Resubmission“- Session tomorrow at 11:00 in room 107, E1 3 for everyone who has to resubmit. I suspect that it will not be too crowded, so if you want to avoid waiting times, tomorrow would be a good… Read more

Hello everyone,

The results of Project Phase 5 are online now. There will be a „Fix My Resubmission“- Session tomorrow at 11:00 in room 107, E1 3 for everyone who has to resubmit. I suspect that it will not be too crowded, so if you want to avoid waiting times, tomorrow would be a good opportunity.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Feedback for Revisions of Project Phase 4

Written on 25.06.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

The results for the Revisions of Project Phase 4 are online now. Please take a look at the feedback on your personal status page, as it might contain information that is relevant for future submissions.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Cancelled: Today‘s Online Training Session

Written on 17.06.24 by Sarah Sterz

Dear everybody,

Unfortunately, we had to cancel today‘s online training session. In case you wanted to attend, I suggest the following: log in to the session and do the exercises (which you can download in the Materials section of the dCMS) with the other students there. Then, either post your… Read more

Dear everybody,

Unfortunately, we had to cancel today‘s online training session. In case you wanted to attend, I suggest the following: log in to the session and do the exercises (which you can download in the Materials section of the dCMS) with the other students there. Then, either post your solutions in the Forum to get feedback on them or come to tomorrow‘s online office hour.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Fix My Assignment Session Tomorrow and Next Week

Written on 13.06.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

Last week, the "Fix My Assignment" session was very popular with you. So, we decided that we will have another "Fix My Assignment" session tomorrow and an even longer one next week (see calendar for details). Please use them for your current assignments and for the revise and… Read more

Hello everybody,

Last week, the "Fix My Assignment" session was very popular with you. So, we decided that we will have another "Fix My Assignment" session tomorrow and an even longer one next week (see calendar for details). Please use them for your current assignments and for the revise and resubmits of the last assignment. Even though we operate at maximum capacity, there probably will be some wait times, so please come to the session early if you can. Of course, you can also use the regular office hours if you have any questions, for example about assignments.

Also, please start working on your resubmission in time. If you only come to next week's "Fix My Assignment" session and only then learn that your resubmission still has issues, you might not have sufficient time anymore before the deadline to fix these issues. I urge you to take the Revise and Resubmit very seriously, since the consequence of failing it will be that the whole group will not get the exam admission.

If you have general questions, you also can always use the forum to discuss them.

Best wishes,
Sarah

 

PS: In case you are interested in them, you can now see statistics for the project phases on your personal status page, if you click on the name of the project phase in the section "Tests And Exams". Currently, 38.3% of students passed Project Phase 4. The other 61.7% have to revise and resubmit.

 

 

Fix My Assignment Session on Friday

Written on 05.06.24 (last change on 05.06.24) by Sarah Sterz

Friday will be the deadline for the current project phase. Those who have last minute questions can go to the Fix My Assignment Session on Friday. There, you will get help with checking the validity of your argument and making sure likely that your assignment will get a pass. The Fix My AssignmentRead more

Friday will be the deadline for the current project phase. Those who have last minute questions can go to the Fix My Assignment Session on Friday. There, you will get help with checking the validity of your argument and making sure likely that your assignment will get a pass. The Fix My Assignment Session will take place in room 107 in E1 3 from 11:00 to 13:00. The timing is such that you can join even if you have a lecture in the morning or at noon.

Edit: I formulated my message a bit misleadingly, sorry about that! There will not be hard guarantees for passes in the Fix My Assignment Session, since passes are only decided during the actual correction of the assignment. But Yannic, who will lead the session, will be able to give you a very good idea if your assignment is done well enough yet such that it will get a pass, and he will be able to help you improve in case it still has major issues. (Also, expect some waiting times during Fix My Assignment.)

Best wishes,
Sarah

Feedback for Project Phase 3

Written on 04.06.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

Since I am attending a conference right now and therefore am traveling, I had trouble to find the time to complete the review of your assignments for Project Phase 3 as well as the previous revise and resubmit. Apologies for that! This should not be a disadvantage to you, though.… Read more

Hello everyone,

Since I am attending a conference right now and therefore am traveling, I had trouble to find the time to complete the review of your assignments for Project Phase 3 as well as the previous revise and resubmit. Apologies for that! This should not be a disadvantage to you, though. You will receive the assignments over the course of this Tuesday. To compensate for the delay, the deadline for the revise and resubmit was extended one week and the number of revises and resubmits that you are allowed to have was increased by one, so you can revise and resubmit 3 instead of 2 times now.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Reminder: No Lecture Today

Written on 03.06.24 (last change on 03.06.24) by Sarah Sterz

Dear everyone,

This is a friendly reminder that there is no lecture this week. The other events like recap sessions and office hours take place as usual. You are very much invited to utilize those, especially in preparation for the current and the upcomming assignments.

Best wishes,
Sarah

No Deep Dive Session Tomorrow

Written on 20.05.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

There will be no deep dive session tomorrow. The recap sessions and the online office hour will take place as usual.

Best wishes,
Sarah

This is how you might fail Ethics for Nerds

Written on 16.05.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

Now that I got your attention by using some good, old click-bait, let me tell you something really important: many students underestimate how much training it needs to write valid arguments. Writing valid arguments is important in this lecture, so you should allocate enough time for… Read more

Hello everyone,

Now that I got your attention by using some good, old click-bait, let me tell you something really important: many students underestimate how much training it needs to write valid arguments. Writing valid arguments is important in this lecture, so you should allocate enough time for that. Project Phase 4 will ask you to write a valid argument, and so will the exam. We suggest the following timeline to learn validity:

  1. Until Monday, May 20: Finish watching the videos of PT2 if you have not already done so.
  2. Between Tuesday, May 21 and Monday, May 27: Go to one of the Recap Sessions on how to detect invalidity in the arguments of others. There will be at least three in-person and one online recap session on this topic.
  3. Between Tuesday, May 28 and Thursday, June 6: Go to one of the Recap Sessions on how to write valid arguments yourselves. There will be at least five in-person and one online recap session on this topic.
  4. While you do Project Phase 4: Attend an office hour to get feedback on your argument.

Best wishes,
Sarah

PS: The feedback for Project Phase 2 went online today. You might want to take a look at the feedback that you got on your personal status page.

Revise and Resubmit

Written on 06.05.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

You will get feedback for your first assignment shortly, most likely on Wednesday. You nevertheless can see a submission called "Revise and Resubmit: Project Phase 1" already. This does not mean that you did not pass. Please use this submission only in one of two cases,… Read more

Hello everybody,

You will get feedback for your first assignment shortly, most likely on Wednesday. You nevertheless can see a submission called "Revise and Resubmit: Project Phase 1" already. This does not mean that you did not pass. Please use this submission only in one of two cases, namely

  1. when you missed the deadline for the submission of Project Phase 1 and want to make a late submission.
  2. when you failed your first assignment. You can tell when there is a "not passed" displayed next to your assignment.

The same will hold for every project phase except for phase 6 and 7, where no revise and resubmit will be possible.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Links for Online Sessions

Written on 30.04.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everybody,

like it was announced, some recap sessions and office hours will take place online in MS teams. Click the following links if you want to participate:

Hello everybody,

like it was announced, some recap sessions and office hours will take place online in MS teams. Click the following links if you want to participate:

You can find the times and places of all non-online meetings in the timetable.

Best,
Sarah

Reminder: Guest Lecture today at 4 pm

Written on 25.04.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

I just wanted to give you a quick reminder of today's guest lecture. Elijah Millgram is a very proficient philosopher and usually gives awesome talks that are very entertaining. He even took the time to write an alternative abstract for his talk for you (see below).

Title:Read more

Hello everyone,

I just wanted to give you a quick reminder of today's guest lecture. Elijah Millgram is a very proficient philosopher and usually gives awesome talks that are very entertaining. He even took the time to write an alternative abstract for his talk for you (see below).

Title: Instrumentalism, Moral-Theory Overlays, and the Control Problem
Speaker: Elijah Millgram, professor of philosophy from the University of Utah
Date: today at 4pm at the
Place: German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in building D3 2 (that's next to the Mensa), room Reuse HG 2.17.

Abstract (normal): How do we make sure that the much more capable AI agents of the future behave themselves and don't get out of line? The default response to worries about alignment and the control problem overlays constraints on AI decision making processes which are normally adapted from some familiar moral theory. Examining Stuart Russell's representative proposal makes it clear that recommendations of this kind will not work, and shows why it is a mistake to see the underlying issue as a question of control.
Abstract (fun): You know, evolution tried to build its theory of what we're supposed to be doing into the wetware, and look what *we* did with it: ultraprocessed junk food, rom-coms, and don't forget the bichon frisees and shih tzus. Why think our own attempts to build moral guidelines into future AI are going to fare any better? We should be taking a completely different approach, where our objective is not to *control* the AI agents we build, but to make healthy relationships with them possible, by ensuring that we can get a divorce when we want one.

The lecture is optional, but it will for sure be interesting! The event is public, so if you know anyone else who wants to attend, you can bring them along. The lecture is not recorded or streamed.

I hope to see many of you around!
Sarah

Timetable

Written on 23.04.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

Please note that you can find all dates of office hours, recap sessions and deep dive sessions in the timetable. This week, no sessions are taking place. I was informed that there was a mistake in the timetable this morning, falsely claiming that the deep dive session will take… Read more

Hello everyone,

Please note that you can find all dates of office hours, recap sessions and deep dive sessions in the timetable. This week, no sessions are taking place. I was informed that there was a mistake in the timetable this morning, falsely claiming that the deep dive session will take place today. If you planned to attend and found yourself in an empty seminar room, please apologize! There will be cookies in the next deep dive session to make it up to you. (Please don't attend for the cookies only, though.)

Best wishes
Sarah

Study, Guest Lecture, and more

Written on 22.04.24 by Sarah Sterz

Hello everyone,

Thanks for the great first lecture! I want to let anyone who did not attend the lecture know a few important things and remind those who attended:

  1. The Ethics for Nerds study: You are invited to take part in a study on the effects of Ethics for Nerds. It would be a huge help… Read more

Hello everyone,

Thanks for the great first lecture! I want to let anyone who did not attend the lecture know a few important things and remind those who attended:

  1. The Ethics for Nerds study: You are invited to take part in a study on the effects of Ethics for Nerds. It would be a huge help for me if you could take part, and you can even win one of ten gift cards worth 20€. You are entirely anonymous to me, and I will never be able to know what you answered during the survey or whether you even took place. So, there is no risk involved in taking part. You can only take part until the end of this week. You can enter the survey on your personal status page or via a link in an email that you will receive shortly.
     
  2. The guest lecture: We will have a guest lecture called "Instrumentalism, Moral-Theory Overlays, and the Control Problem" by Elijah Millgram from the Univeristy of Utah. It will take place this Thursday, on April 25 at 4pm at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in building D3 2 (that's next to the Mensa), room Reuse HG 2.17. The lecture is optional, but it will for sure be interesting! You can also find the time and location in the timetable. The event is public, so if you know anyone else who wants to attend, you can bring them along.
     
  3. Lecture recordings: Please watch the recording of the first lecture if you did not attend, since I explain important information on the course, especially concerning its organization and the exam admission. You can find the lecture recordings and the slides in the dCMS in the Materials section.

Best wishes,
Sarah

Show all

Ethics for Nerds

Time: Monday, 10-12 
Place: GHH (building E2 2)

Due to the semester kick-off on April 15, Ethics for Nerds will start on Monday, April 22.

Many computer scientists will be confronted with morally difficult situations at some point in their career – be it in research, in business, or in industry. Ethics for Nerds equips you with the crucial assets enabling you to recognize such situations, and to devise ways to arrive at a justified moral judgment regarding the moral problems you will encounter. For that, you will be made familiar with moral theories from philosophy, as well as different Codes of Ethics for computer scientists. Since one can quickly get lost when talking about ethics and morals, it is especially important to talk and argue clearly and precisely. In order to prepare you for that, Ethics for Nerds also covers what is usually known as "Critical Thinking". In the end, you will be able to assess a morally controversial topic from computer science on your own and give a convincing argument for your assessment.

Ethics for Nerds is intended to always be as clear, precise, and analytic as possible. What you won't find here is the meaningless bla-bla, needlessly poetic language, and vague and wordy profundity that some people tend to associate with philosophy. You will, however, get many interesting insights into philosophy, ethics, and computer science – or so we have been told.

This course is a Vertiefungsvorlesung and worth 6 ECTS-points. All bachelor and master students (of all subjects) are welcome! :)

Contents

This course covers:

  • an introduction to the methods of philosophy and the basics of normative as well as applied ethics;
  • relevant moral codices issued by professional associations like the ACM, the IEEE, and more;
  • argumentation theory (also known as "Critical Thinking")
  • starting points to evaluate practices and technologies already in use or not that far away, including for instance: filter bubbles and echo chambers, ML-algorithms as predictive tools, GPS-tracking, CCTV and other tools from surveillance, fitness trackers, big data analysis, autonomous vehicles, lethal autonomous weapons systems and so on;
  • and more.

Prerequisites

We expect basic knowledge of propositional and first-order logic, an open mind, and interest to look at computer science in ways you probably are not used to. (If you come from a subject of study that usually does not cover logics, you can nevertheless take the course. Just get in touch with us before.)

The lecture and all its materials are in English, but if you feel more comfortable to write assignments and exams in German, you are invited to do so. For this course you should at least have a level of either German or English that is equivalent to a C1 level (see here for further details). We do not need any formal proof that you fulfil these requirements, but we recommend taking them seriously. If you are in any doubt whether this course is suitable for you, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us.

Organization

There is a weekly lecture as well as office hours and different kinds of tutorials that you can (but to not have to) attend. In order to get the exam admission, you will do small assignments and a project in which you will become part of a fictitious Ethical Review Board. Your final grade will be determined by the exam (or the re-exam).

Literature (not mandatory)

Upon request, we added some literature that may be interesting to read before the course. Reading this, however, is not mandatory! We will cover everything that you will need to know during the course (except for the presuppositions above). You will not have a disadvantage if you do not read any of the literature that follows:

  1. Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics?. Metaphilosophy, 16(4), 266-275.
    A rather old paper that is nevertheless still very relevant today. Available here.
  2. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    This is the wikipedia of philosophy. Many (though not all) of the articles there are high-quality. Among others, the following articles are relevant for Ethics for Nerds and are relatively easy to understand without a philosophical background:
  3. Another resource of material can be the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, in particular the following articles:
  4. Rosenberg, J. F. (1984). The practice of philosophy: A handbook for beginners.
    If you are very much into philosophy, you can also dive a little deeper into the daily business of philosophers by having a look at this all-time-classic introduction to being a philosopher. Sadly, the English edition of this book is usually very expensive, but you will find the book in the SULB and in the philosophy library. The German translation is equally good as the English original.
Privacy Policy | Legal Notice
If you encounter technical problems, please contact the administrators